Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Frauds in the Field (Bentley Historical Library)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Frauds in the Field, published by the University of Michigan's Bentley Historical Library in 2019, summarizes the Soper-Scotford manufacture of thousands of fabricated ancient artifacts across Michigan between 1890 and 1920 and Richard Stamps's 2001 forensic analysis concluding the objects were modern forgeries. Its strength is that the Bentley Historical Library holds the actual archival papers documenting the hoax's operation and Stamps's own forensic findings, making this an institutional account grounded in primary custody of the relevant record rather than secondhand retelling. Its limit is that it is a magazine style institutional summary rather than a full scholarly monograph on the Michigan relics hoax, so a claim needing the complete detail of Stamps's forensic methodology or the fullest account of how thousands of objects were fabricated and planted benefits from his original analysis and other dedicated studies of the hoax alongside this summary.

Facts
Citation
Author
Bentley Historical Library, University of Michigan
Publisher
University of Michigan
Publication Year
2019
URL
https://bentley.umich.edu/news-events/magazine/frauds-in-the-field/
Source Type
reference
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Frauds in the Field, published by the University of Michigan's Bentley Historical Library in 2019, is an archival institution's own magazine feature summarizing a documented hoax from its own collection, the middle tier reflecting institutional archival writing rather than a peer reviewed journal article.
Notes
Summarises the Soper-Scotford manufacture and Richard Stamps' 2001 forensic analysis concluding forgery.
Claims Backed By This Source (17 claims)

This source backs 17 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested, 2 popular myth - corrected. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Artifacts & Relics, 6 claims: 3 well-attested, 2 popular myth - corrected, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.