This is Paul Redding's Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, maintained by the Metaphysics Research Lab at Stanford University, first published in 1997 and periodically revised since. As a peer-reviewed, continuously revised scholarly reference by a specialist in German idealism it covers Hegel's system, his dialectical method and his standing in the history of philosophy. Its strength is that Stanford Encyclopedia entries undergo editorial review and revision by recognized specialists, distinguishing them from a fixed-edition monograph that cannot be updated. Its limit is that Hegel's own writing is famously difficult and contested in interpretation, so a claim resting on one specific, disputed reading of Hegel should be checked against the wider secondary literature the entry itself surveys.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Paul Redding's Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, maintained under the encyclopedia's own editorial board since 1997, an authored and reviewed reference rather than independent peer-reviewed monograph scholarship, hence the middle tier. NotesPaul Redding's Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; a peer-reviewed, continuously revised scholarly reference, not a fixed-edition monograph.
Citation
AuthorPaul Redding
PublisherMetaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
Publication Year1997
URLhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hegel/
Source Typereference
Claims Backed By This Source (30 claims)
This source backs 30 claims across the atlas. As facts: 22 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds, 1 connected, 1 held Differently. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Philosophical Schools, 11 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 held Differently, 1 general references.
- Articles, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 connected, 2 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Historical Figures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.