Livia Kohn's God of the Dao, Lord Lao in History and Myth, published by the University of Michigan Center for Chinese Studies in 1998, is a scholarly study tracing the deification of Laozi as Lord Lao across the history of Daoist religion, from his role as a sage philosopher in early texts to his standing as a major cosmic deity in later organized Daoism. Kohn is a specialist in Daoist studies working from the primary Daoist textual corpus across a very long historical span. Its strength is that comprehensive, primary source based tracing of a single figure's religious development over roughly two millennia. Its limit is the scale of that span itself: compressing so long and regionally varied a development means individual local or sectarian variations in how Lord Lao was understood receive less depth than a narrower, period specific study could offer.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Livia Kohn's God of the Dao, Lord Lao in History and Myth, published by the University of Michigan Center for Chinese Studies in 1998, is a peer reviewed scholarly study by a specialist in Daoist studies, treated at the top tier. NotesLivia Kohn's scholarly study of Lord Lao in Daoist history and myth.
Citation
AuthorLivia Kohn
PublisherUniversity of Michigan Center for Chinese Studies
Publication Year1998
Source Typeacademic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Laozi, Figures This source names Laozi directly: "study tracing the deification of Laozi as Lord Lao across the history of Daoist religion, from his role as a sage philosopher in early texts to his standing as a major cosmic deity in later..."
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)
This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Figures, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
- Deities, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.