Grant v. Canada (Attorney General), decided by the Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division, in 1995, is a primary legal judgment. Its strength is that it is the actual ruling dismissing a challenge to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police's 1990 decision permitting the turban to be worn with the uniform. Its limit is the ordinary one for a single court decision: it addresses the specific challenge before it under Canadian law.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Reliability tier 1: the primary legal judgment itself, authoritative for the specific ruling and the challenge it addressed. NotesDismissed a challenge to the RCMP's 1990 decision permitting the turban to be worn with uniform.
Citation
AuthorFederal Court of Canada, Trial Division
PublisherFederal Court of Canada
Publication Year1995
Source TypeCase law
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Canada directly: "Grant v. Canada (Attorney General), decided by the Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division, in 1995, is a primary legal judgment."
Claims Backed By This Source (9 claims)
This source backs 9 claims across the atlas. As facts: 7 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Religious Dress & Vestments, 1 claims: 1 general references.
General References
1Religious Dress & Vestments
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.