Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Herbals: Their Origin and Evolution: A Chapter in the History of Botany, 1470-1670

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Agnes Arber's is the standard scholarly history of the printed herbal, now in its second edition, revised since its original 1912 publication, and it is the specific work through which this atlas cites Nicholas Culpeper, whose own Complete Herbal is separately held at a lower tier as a primary tradition text rather than outside scholarship. That documented editorial revision across editions and its role as the critical framework around a primary text this atlas also holds directly are the real basis for its standing. This record has not independently traced further scholarly disagreement with Arber's specific claims since the second edition. Use it for the documented history and evolution of the printed herbal as a genre; use Culpeper's own text for what he himself claimed.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Agnes Arber's standard scholarly history of the printed herbal, now in its second edition, revised since its original 1912 publication; the specific work through which this atlas cites Nicholas Culpeper's own text, which is separately held at a lower tier as a primary tradition source.
Notes
Second edition; first published 1912. The standard study of the printed herbal, and the authority through which this atlas cites Culpeper, whose own Complete Herbal is held at Tier 2 (Source 23).
Citation
Author
Agnes Arber
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Publication Year
1938
URL
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/herbals-their-origin-and-evolution/9240F5B6128222EBE51013ADBAB32FA4
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (170 claims)

This source backs 170 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 102 popular myth - corrected. Plus 56 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Plants, 161 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 102 popular myth - corrected, 55 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Historical Figures, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

Plants

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.