Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Hofmann Forgeries (Church History Topics)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Hofmann Forgeries is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints's own topic essay, published through the Church Historian's Press in 2019, giving the institution's account of the Mark Hofmann forgery case, including the forged salamander letter, the 1985 bombings Hofmann committed to conceal his fraud, and his 1987 guilty plea. Its strength is that it is the affected institution's own public reckoning with an episode in which the church itself was deceived and, before the forgeries were exposed, had acquired and in some cases suppressed forged documents, making the essay notable simply for existing as an official acknowledgment. Its limit is that a custodian institution writing about its own past deception has an interest in how the episode is framed, so a claim about the church's specific internal handling of the forged documents before exposure is better checked against the independent journalistic and legal record of the case as well.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Hofmann Forgeries is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints' own topic essay, published through its Church Historian's Press, the middle tier reflecting an institutional self-account of an episode that directly involved and embarrassed the church, notwithstanding the essay's own candor about the forgeries and the resulting deaths.
Notes
Custodian body's account of the Hofmann forgeries, including the salamander letter, the bombings, and the 1987 guilty plea.
Citation
Author
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Publisher
Church Historian's Press
Publication Year
2019
URL
https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/history/topics/hofmann-forgeries
Source Type
custodian topic essay
Custodian
Custodian Source
Yes
Custodian Body
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Custodian Basis
Owning religious body: holds the document in its archives and gives the authoritative account of it within its tradition.
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)

This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested, 3 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 11 claims: 11 well-attested.
  • Artifacts & Relics, 8 claims: 2 well-attested, 3 popular myth - corrected, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.

Well-attested

14

Articles

Artifacts & Relics

Popular myth - corrected

3

Artifacts & Relics

Holds

2

Artifacts & Relics

General References

1

Artifacts & Relics

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.