Paul Kraus's Jabir ibn Hayyan, Contribution a l'histoire des idees scientifiques dans l'Islam, published by the Institut francais d'archeologie orientale in Cairo in 1942, is the philological study that established the Jabirian corpus, the vast body of alchemical and scientific texts attributed to the eighth century figure Jabir ibn Hayyan, as the accumulated work of a later school writing across roughly a century, from around 850 to 950 CE, rather than the output of one historical author. Kraus's textual dating has held up in the scholarship since. Its strength is that rigorous, source critical philology, still the starting point for any study of the corpus. Its limit is that Kraus went further and identified the school's authors with Ismaili circles specifically, a further claim that has not held up as well as his dating and should be treated as his own more contested thesis rather than as settled alongside it.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Paul Kraus's Jabir ibn Hayyan, published by the Institut francais d'archeologie orientale in Cairo in 1942, is the philological study that established the dating of the Jabirian corpus and has held up in the scholarship since, treated at the top tier for that rigorous source critical work, notwithstanding Kraus's own more contested further thesis linking the school to Ismaili circles. NotesThe philological study that dated the Jabirian corpus to roughly 850-950 CE and showed it to be the work of a school rather than one eighth-century author. Kraus's dating has held; his further identification of the authors with Ismaili circles has not.
Citation
AuthorPaul Kraus
PublisherInstitut francais d'archeologie orientale
Publication Year1942
Source Typeacademic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Cairo, Cities This source names Cairo directly: "francais d'archeologie orientale in Cairo in 1942, is the philological study that established the Jabirian corpus, the vast body of alchemical and scientific texts attributed to the eighth century..."
Claims Backed By This Source (23 claims)
This source backs 23 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Historical Figures, 9 claims: 4 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Numerology Systems, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.