This is the Johnson-Humrickhouse Museum's own institutional account of its founding and its custody of the Newark Holy Stones collection, a set of inscribed artifacts long debated as either genuine ancient inscriptions or nineteenth century forgeries. As a standing custodial record from the holding institution itself, it is a reliable source for provenance facts, that the museum holds these specific objects and how it came to. Its limit is that it is the institution's own account of itself rather than an independent scholarly analysis of the stones' authenticity, a question mainstream archaeology treats as settled against authenticity and which this atlas's own sourcing on the stones, including Ohio History Connection's independent analysis, addresses directly.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Custodial/institutional self-account (a museum's own record of its holdings). Museums and other institutional self-accounts sit at tier 2, not tier 1 or tier 3; tier 3 is reserved for a tradition's own account of its own teachings and practice. NotesJohnson-Humrickhouse Museum's own custodial record for the object it holds. A standing institutional or private-holder record, not a scholarly publication; use for provenance and holding-institution facts, not for the object's own history or meaning.
Custodian
Custodian SourceYes
Custodian BodyJohnson-Humrickhouse Museum
Custodian BasisThe museum's own account of its founding and its custody of the Newark Holy Stones collection.
Citation
PublisherJohnson-Humrickhouse Museum
URLhttps://www.jhmuseum.org/newark-holy-stones.html
Source TypeMuseum
Claims Backed By This Source (15 claims)
This source backs 15 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 9 claims: 9 well-attested.
- Custodians & Museums, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
- Artifacts & Relics, 1 claims: 1 holds.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.