Mona Hassan is a scholar of Islamic history, and this Princeton University Press book is her transregional history of Muslim mourning for and memory of the abolished caliphate, tracing responses across the Muslim world both after the Mongol destruction of the Abbasid caliphate and after its formal abolition by the Turkish Republic in 1924. Its strength is genuinely transregional research, drawing on sources from across the Muslim world rather than focusing on one country or period alone, to show how the idea of the caliphate persisted as a symbol long after its institutional end. Its limit is that it is a history of memory and mourning specifically, so a claim about the caliphate's actual medieval governing institutions and law needs a source focused on that earlier operating history rather than its later memory.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Published by Princeton University Press as Mona Hassan's academic history of the caliphate's afterlife, peer reviewed university press scholarship. NotesHassan's transregional history of Muslim mourning for and memory of the abolished caliphate.
Citation
AuthorMona Hassan
PublisherPrinceton University Press
Publication Year2016
Source Typeacademic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Mongols directly: "Mona Hassan is a scholar of Islamic history, and this Princeton University Press book is her transregional history of Muslim mourning for and memory of the abolished caliphate, tracing responses..."
Claims Backed By This Source (33 claims)
This source backs 33 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 9 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 1 held Differently. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Empires & Polities, 8 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 3 holds, 2 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Religious Events, 7 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 4 holds, 1 general references.
- Organizations, 5 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected, 1 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 1 general references.
- Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
- Denominations, 2 claims: 1 held Differently, 1 general references.
Popular myth - corrected
1Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.