The Mawangdui silk manuscripts of the Laozi are two Han dynasty era manuscript copies of the Daodejing recovered from the Mawangdui tomb site in 1973, predating by centuries the received text long used for translation, and notably reversing the order of the work's two halves, with one copy carrying no chapter divisions at all, showing that the familiar eighty-one chapter division is a later editorial convention rather than original to the text. Its strength is that it is direct archaeological manuscript evidence, among the oldest Laozi material known, and it materially changed scholarly understanding of the text's early transmission. Its limit is that a translation drawing on these manuscripts still involves interpretive choices about a fragmentary, damaged silk text, so a claim resting on a specific reading of a single passage should be checked against the manuscript's own textual notes rather than treated as an unambiguous recovery of an original.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
The Mawangdui silk manuscripts of the Laozi, recovered from the 1973 Han dynasty tomb excavation, are direct archaeological manuscript evidence among the oldest Laozi material known, material that materially changed scholarly understanding of the text's early transmission, treated at the top tier. NotesReverse the order of the two halves, and one copy carries no chapter divisions, so the eighty-one-chapter division is editorial.
Citation
AuthorLaozi (attributed)
PublisherBallantine Books
Publication Year1989
URLhttps://archive.org/details/laotzutetaoching0000laoz
Source Typeprimary-text
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Laozi, Figures This source names Laozi directly: "The Mawangdui silk manuscripts of the Laozi are two Han dynasty era manuscript copies of the Daodejing recovered from the Mawangdui tomb site in 1973, predating by centuries the received text long..."
Claims Backed By This Source (21 claims)
This source backs 21 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 7 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Disciplines, 4 claims: 3 holds, 1 general references.
- Scripture Portions, 4 claims: 2 scholarly debate, 2 general references.
- Figures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
- Historical Figures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
- Numbers, 1 claims: 1 general references.
- Scriptures & Texts, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.