Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Medieval Exegesis: The Four Senses of Scripture

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Henri de Lubac was a Catholic theologian, and this is the English translation, published by Eerdmans and T&T Clark, of his major study of medieval biblical exegesis, tracing the traditional fourfold method of reading scripture, the literal, allegorical, moral and anagogical senses, across the medieval Christian interpretive tradition. Its strength is that it remains the standard scholarly account of this interpretive framework, grounded in de Lubac's own deep familiarity with the patristic and medieval sources he traces, first published in French between 1959 and 1964 and translated into English beginning with this 1998 volume. Its limit is that it is a study of the Christian, largely Catholic, exegetical tradition specifically, so a claim about how Jewish or other traditions read scripture in comparable multi-layered ways needs a different, tradition-specific source.

Facts
Citation
Author
Henri de Lubac
Publisher
Eerdmans / T&T Clark
Publication Year
1998
URL
https://archive.org/details/medievalexegesis0000luba_w5w3
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by Eerdmans and T&T Clark, established academic theology publishers, as Henri de Lubac's foundational scholarly study of medieval biblical interpretation, peer reviewed academic-level scholarship.
Notes
English translation of Exegese medievale; first English volume translated by Mark Sebanc, 1998. French original published 1959 to 1964.
Claims Backed By This Source (35 claims)

This source backs 35 claims across the atlas. As facts: 25 well-attested. As cited relationships: 7 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Doctrines, 19 claims: 11 well-attested, 7 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.