Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis, Steven T. Katz's 1978 edited volume from Oxford University Press, is the collection that opened the constructivist argument against a single common core underlying all mystical experience across traditions, gathering essays from established philosophers of religion. Its authority rests on peer academic contribution and its lasting influence on how comparative mysticism is studied. Its limit is that it argues one side of a real and continuing scholarly debate rather than settling it. Cite it for the standing of mysticism as a comparative category and for the constructivist position specifically, not as a neutral verdict on any one tradition's own mystical claims.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Steven T. Katz's edited volume Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis, published by Oxford University Press in 1978, the top tier reflecting the peer academic collection that opened the constructivist argument against a single common core underlying all mystical experience across traditions, with lasting influence on how comparative mysticism is studied. It argues one side of a real and continuing scholarly debate rather than settling it; cite it for the standing of mysticism as a comparative category and the constructivist position specifically, not as a neutral verdict on any one tradition's own mystical claims.
Notes
The volume that opened the constructivist case against a common core of mystical experience. Cited here for the standing of "mysticism" as a comparative category, not for any claim about a particular tradition.
Citation
Author
Steven T. Katz (ed.)
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Year
1978
Source Type
Edited volume
Claims Backed By This Source (11 claims)

This source backs 11 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Subcategories, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.

General References

1

Subcategories

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.