Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

N.T. Wright, The Resurrection of the Son of God

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

N.T. Wright's The Resurrection of the Son of God is a major, closely argued historical monograph defending the claim that the bodily resurrection of Jesus is the best historical explanation for the rise of early Christian belief, built on Wright's extensive scholarly command of first century Jewish and Greco-Roman ideas about the afterlife. It is respected across the field for its historical rigor and comprehensiveness even by scholars who reject its conclusion, and that split matters: Wright's affirmative historical case for a bodily resurrection remains a minority position within mainstream historical-critical New Testament scholarship, most of which treats the resurrection as a claim outside what historical method can adjudicate either way, or explains the belief through visionary or other naturalistic accounts. Cite Wright as a serious scholarly argument for a contested conclusion, not as the field's settled verdict.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Reliability tier 2: a major scholarly monograph respected across the field for its rigor even where its conclusion remains a minority position within mainstream historical-critical scholarship.
Notes
N. T. Wright's scholarly study of the resurrection of Jesus in its historical and theological context.
Citation
Author
N.T. Wright
Publisher
Fortress Press
Publication Year
2003
Source Type
book
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)

This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
  • Religious Events, 3 claims: 2 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Miracles, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Doctrines, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.