Navajo Nation v. United States Forest Service, 535 F.3d 1058, decided en banc by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 2008, is the primary legal text itself, the appellate ruling that using recycled wastewater to make artificial snow on the San Francisco Peaks, sacred to the Navajo and several other tribes, did not violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act because it did not coerce the tribes to act against their beliefs or penalize their exercise of religion. Its strength is that it is the actual controlling appellate opinion on this specific dispute, so a claim about the legal reasoning or outcome can be checked against the Court's own words rather than a paraphrase, including the substantial dissent's opposing view of what counts as a substantial burden on religious exercise. Its limit is that the ruling settles the federal statutory question under RFRA, it does not itself describe the San Francisco Peaks' religious significance to the tribes in any depth, which a claim about that significance needs a different source to establish.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Navajo Nation v. United States Forest Service, 535 F.3d 1058, is the actual 2008 en banc opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, a primary legal text of the first order, treated at the top tier as the Court's own controlling holding. NotesThe United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's own en banc opinion in Navajo Nation v. United States Forest Service (2008); the court's ruling on the legal claim before it, not a historical or religious-studies account of the sacred site at issue.
Citation
AuthorUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Publication Year2008
Source TypeCase law
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)
This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sacred Sites, 9 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.
- Religions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.