Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Nebuchadnezzar II (reference article)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Nebuchadnezzar II's Wikipedia article is a community-edited encyclopedia entry rather than a peer-reviewed publication. Its strength is that it is adequate for the standard, uncontroversial biographical and chronological facts about the Neo-Babylonian king. Its limit is that a claim resting on a contested chronological or textual point about Nebuchadnezzar's reign needs a specialist Assyriological source, not a general encyclopedia entry.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Reliability tier 3: a community edited encyclopedia entry adequate for standard biographical and chronological facts but not a substitute for specialist Assyriological scholarship.
Notes
Wikipedia's article on Nebuchadnezzar II. A perpetually community-edited reference page rather than a peer-reviewed publication; use for standard, uncontroversial facts about Nebuchadnezzar II (biographical detail, dates, common definitions), not as the source for a contested or specialist scholarly claim.
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebuchadnezzar_II
Source Type
reference
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Babylonians, Cultures

This source names Babylonians directly: "Nebuchadnezzar II's Wikipedia article is a community-edited encyclopedia entry rather than a peer-reviewed publication."

Source Nebuchadnezzar II (reference article)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (34 claims)

This source backs 34 claims across the atlas. As facts: 32 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Historical Figures, 27 claims: 26 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds.

Well-attested

32

Historical Figures

General References

1

Historical Figures

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.