Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Neo-Daoism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is Alan Chan's Neo-Daoism entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, first published 1 October 2009 and substantively revised 28 May 2019, maintained by the Metaphysics Research Lab at Stanford University. As a peer-reviewed, continuously revised scholarly reference by a specialist in early Chinese philosophy it covers Neo-Daoist, xuanxue, thought of the third and fourth centuries CE, including its engagement with the Daodejing, the Zhuangzi and the Yijing. Its strength is that Stanford Encyclopedia entries are written and periodically revised by recognized specialists under editorial oversight. Its limit is that its most recent substantive revision predates some entries in this same reference, so a claim needing the very latest scholarly consensus should also be checked against more recently updated secondary literature.

Facts
Citation
Author
Alan Chan
Publisher
Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
Publication Year
2009
URL
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/neo-daoism/
Source Type
reference
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Alan Chan's Neo-Daoism entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, first published in 2009 and continuously revised under the encyclopedia's own editorial board, an authored and reviewed reference rather than independent peer-reviewed monograph scholarship, hence the middle tier.
Notes
First published 2009-10-01; substantive revision 2019-05-28. Verified live 2026-08-06.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Yijing directly: "the Daodejing, the Zhuangzi and the Yijing."

Zhuangzi, Figures

This source names Zhuangzi directly: "its engagement with the Daodejing, the Zhuangzi and the Yijing."

Claims Backed By This Source (25 claims)

This source backs 25 claims across the atlas. As facts: 19 well-attested. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Philosophical Schools, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.