Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

New Perspectives on Human Sacrifice and Ritual Body Treatments in Ancient Maya Society

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

New Perspectives on Human Sacrifice and Ritual Body Treatments in Ancient Maya Society, edited by Vera Tiesler and Andrea Cucina and published by the academic press Springer, is a peer reviewed collection of bioarchaeological studies examining skeletal remains from Maya sites for direct physical evidence of sacrificial and post-mortem body treatment. Its authority rests on that method: the contributors work from skeletal evidence itself, cut marks, trauma patterns and burial context, rather than from colonial era textual testimony about Maya practice, which lets their conclusions stand independently of the biases that affect the written record. Its limit is that skeletal evidence can establish what physically happened to a body but is often more limited than text in establishing the ritual meaning or full social context behind it, so its findings are best read alongside the separate textual and iconographic evidence this atlas also draws on for Maya sacrificial practice.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
New Perspectives on Human Sacrifice and Ritual Body Treatments in Ancient Maya Society, edited by Vera Tiesler and Andrea Cucina and published by the academic press Springer in 2007, is a peer reviewed collection of bioarchaeological studies, the top tier reflecting that its contributors work from skeletal evidence directly rather than from colonial era textual testimony, notwithstanding that skeletal evidence is often more limited than text in establishing full ritual meaning.
Notes
Bioarchaeological studies of sacrificial and post-mortem body treatment in the Maya area. Cited as skeletal evidence, independent of colonial testimony, for what was and was not done.
Citation
Author
Vera Tiesler and Andrea Cucina (eds)
Publisher
Springer
Publication Year
2007
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)

This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Studies, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected, 1 general references.
  • Cultures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Historical Periods, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Religions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.