George W. Harley's Notes on the Poro in Liberia, published in the Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology at Harvard University in 1941, is an early and detailed ethnographic study of the Poro men's initiatory society among Liberian peoples, written by a missionary doctor with extended direct fieldwork experience among the communities he describes. Its authority rests on that direct, sustained fieldwork access and its publication through a major academic museum's own scholarly series. Its limit is the position of its author, a Western missionary describing a closed initiatory tradition from outside it, and its age, so later Africanist ethnography and the tradition's own account, where accessible, are worth reading alongside it rather than treating this as the last word on a still living and partly closed practice.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
George W. Harley's Notes on the Poro in Liberia, published through Harvard University's Peabody Museum, is treated at the top tier as academic museum scholarship resting on direct sustained fieldwork, notwithstanding its age and the author's outside missionary vantage on a closed tradition. NotesEthnographic study of the Poro society in Liberia, Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, 1941.
Citation
AuthorGeorge W. Harley
PublisherPapers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, vol. XIX no. 2
Publication Year1941
Source TypeEthnography
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Liberia directly: "Harley's Notes on the Poro in Liberia, published in the Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology at Harvard University in 1941, is an early and detailed ethnographic study..."
Claims Backed By This Source (15 claims)
This source backs 15 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Secret Societies, 5 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
- Religions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.