Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

On Nature and Grace (De Natura et Gratia)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

On Nature and Grace, De Natura et Gratia, written by Augustine of Hippo around 415, is Augustine's own polemical treatise against Pelagius, arguing that human nature, wounded by original sin, cannot achieve righteousness without divine grace, a position that became foundational to later Western Christian, and especially Catholic and Reformation, theology of grace and free will. Its strength is that it is the primary text itself, from the controversy's leading opponent of Pelagianism, so a claim about what Augustine actually argued, rather than how later tradition summarized him, can be checked against his own words. Its limit is that it is one side of a live theological argument, written specifically to refute Pelagius's own treatise On Nature, which does not survive complete and is known largely through Augustine's own quotations of it, so a claim needing a fair account of the Pelagian position itself is working from a source that had every reason to characterize its opponent unfavorably.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
On Nature and Grace, written by Augustine of Hippo around 415, is his own primary polemical treatise against Pelagius, treated at the top tier as the actual text for what Augustine argued, though it is one side of a live controversy rather than a neutral account of the Pelagian position.
Notes
Augustine of Hippo's own early fifth century treatise on nature and grace.
Citation
Author
Augustine of Hippo
Publication Year
415
Source Type
primary-text
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Augustine of Hippo directly: "Grace, De Natura et Gratia, written by Augustine of Hippo around 415, is Augustine's own polemical treatise against Pelagius, arguing that human nature, wounded by original sin, cannot achieve..."

Source On Nature and Grace (De Natura et Gratia)Augustine of Hippo
Claims Backed By This Source (17 claims)

This source backs 17 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 5 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.