Sources
Origins of the Kabbalah
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Gershom Scholem was the foundational modern scholar of Jewish mysticism, and this Princeton University Press book, translated into English by Allan Arkush, is his foundational scholarly history of the origins of Kabbalah, tracing its emergence including the early Bahir text in medieval Provence. Its strength is that it remains the foundational work that established Kabbalah studies as a serious academic field, grounded in Scholem's own extensive manuscript research. Its limit is that it is a foundational mid-twentieth century work, and later scholars, including some of Scholem's own students, have refined and in places revised specific elements of his historical reconstruction, so a claim about the current scholarly consensus on Kabbalah's origins may need a more recent source alongside this still standard foundational history.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Published by Princeton University Press as Gershom Scholem's foundational academic study of Kabbalah, the standard peer reviewed scholarly treatment of the subject. NotesGershom Scholem's foundational scholarly history of the origins of Kabbalah, tracing its emergence including the Bahir text in medieval Provence. Use for established historical facts about Kabbalah's early development as this foundational academic history presents it; a foundational mid-twentieth-century work, and later scholarship has refined some of its historical reconstructions, so a claim about current scholarly consensus may need a more recent source alongside it.
Citation
AuthorGershom Scholem, translated by Allan Arkush
PublisherPrinceton University Press
Publication Year1987
URLhttps://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691182988/origins-of-the-kabbalah
Source Typeacademic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (40 claims)
This source backs 40 claims across the atlas. As facts: 26 well-attested. As cited relationships: 4 holds, 1 connected. Plus 9 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Open Questions, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Articles, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Doctrines, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Esoteric Texts, 5 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 general references.
- Historical Figures, 4 claims: 2 holds, 2 general references.
- Hymns & Liturgical Texts, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Regions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.