This is Dan Attrell and David Porreca's standard English critical translation of the Latin Picatrix, published by Pennsylvania State University Press, and its scholarly introduction carries both the work's dating and the modern rejection of the traditional ascription to al-Majriti, a documented revision of the older attribution this record states rather than repeating the superseded claim. That direct philological engagement with the Latin text, together with the introduction's own critical apparatus, is the edition's real evidentiary basis, distinct from a bare citation of the underlying medieval text. Use it for the content of the Picatrix's astral and talismanic magic as this critical translation renders it, and for its own established textual history and authorship question; a claim about the earlier Arabic Ghayat al-Hakim's own composition needs a source addressing the Arabic textual tradition directly, since this edition's scope is the Latin reception.
Facts
Citation
AuthorDan Attrell and David Porreca (trans.)
PublisherPennsylvania State University Press
Publication Year2019
URLhttps://archive.org/details/picatrix-a-medieval-treatise-on-astral-magic
Source TypeCritical translation with scholarly introduction
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Published by Pennsylvania State University Press as Attrell and Porreca's critical scholarly translation with academic introduction, peer reviewed university press scholarship on the primary text. NotesStandard English critical translation of the Latin Picatrix. Its introduction carries the dating and the modern rejection of the al-Majriti ascription.
Claims Backed By This Source (31 claims)
This source backs 31 claims across the atlas. As facts: 27 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 connected. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Historical Figures, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Open Questions, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
- Categories, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.