Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Purity, Sacrifice, and the Temple: Symbolism and Supersessionism in the Study of Ancient Judaism

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Jonathan Klawans's Purity, Sacrifice, and the Temple, Symbolism and Supersessionism in the Study of Ancient Judaism, published by Oxford University Press in 2006, argues that much modern scholarship on ancient Jewish sacrifice and purity has unconsciously inherited a Christian supersessionist framework, reading Temple practice as spiritually inferior to what replaced it rather than examining it on its own symbolic terms. Klawans is a specialist in ancient Judaism whose earlier work on purity and impurity in ancient Israel is itself a standard reference. Its strength is that reflexive critique, turning scholarly attention to the assumptions historians of religion bring to sacrifice rather than only to the ancient sources themselves, a genuinely field shaping argument. Its limit is that a book built around critiquing other scholarship necessarily engages a specific, named body of earlier work, so a claim resting on the primary ancient evidence for Temple sacrifice itself needs a source presenting that evidence directly, with this book cited for how that evidence has been interpreted.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Jonathan Klawans's Purity, Sacrifice, and the Temple, published by Oxford University Press in 2006, is a field-shaping scholarly argument by a specialist in ancient Judaism whose earlier work is itself a standard reference, treated at the top tier as peer reviewed academic press scholarship.
Notes
A study of how the Temple system has been described by later scholarship, and of the assumptions that shaped those descriptions.
Citation
Author
Jonathan Klawans
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Year
2006
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Israel, Countries

This source names Israel directly: "work on purity and impurity in ancient Israel is itself a standard reference."

Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)

This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. As cited relationships: 6 holds. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Rituals, 10 claims: 1 well-attested, 5 holds, 4 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.