The Ratnagotravibhaga, also known as the Uttaratantra Shastra, attributed to Maitreya with a commentary by Asanga, is the classical Indian Buddhist treatise that systematised the buddha-nature, or tathagatagarbha, teaching, and it is the text at the centre of the later Tibetan rangtong-shentong dispute over how its positive language about buddha-nature is properly read. As a primary scriptural and philosophical text, it is authoritative for what the treatise itself actually says, which grounds both sides of that later interpretive dispute. It records the classical Indian source text, not any one side's later reading of it, so a claim about how a specific tradition interprets it needs that tradition's own commentarial source alongside this one.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
The Ratnagotravibhaga is the classical Indian Buddhist primary treatise itself that systematised the buddha-nature teaching, treated at the top tier as the primary scriptural and philosophical source authoritative for what the treatise itself actually says. NotesThe classical Indian treatise systematising the buddha-nature (tathagatagarbha) teaching, and the text at the centre of the later rangtong-shentong dispute over how its positive language is to be read.
Citation
AuthorAttributed to Maitreya, with commentary by Asanga
Source Typeprimary-text
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Maitreya directly: "Uttaratantra Shastra, attributed to Maitreya with a commentary by Asanga, is the classical Indian Buddhist treatise that systematised the buddha-nature, or tathagatagarbha, teaching, and it is the..."
Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)
This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 7 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Beliefs & Restrictions, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Doctrines, 3 claims: 1 holds, 2 general references.
- Denominations, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.