Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Rituals and Power: The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia Minor

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Simon Price's Rituals and Power is a scholarly study of the Roman imperial cult as practiced in the Greek cities of Asia Minor, published by Cambridge University Press and widely regarded as the field defining treatment of the topic. Price argues, against an older assumption that emperor worship was either cynical politics or naive credulity, that it functioned as a genuinely coherent religious system that made sense within existing Greek civic religious practice. Its authority rests on close use of epigraphic and archaeological evidence from the cities themselves and on its lasting influence over how classicists and religious studies scholars since have approached ruler cult generally. Its limit is regional focus, Asia Minor specifically, so a claim about the imperial cult's different character in Rome itself or in other provinces needs a source addressing that different region.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Simon Price's Rituals and Power, published by Cambridge University Press, is a field-defining scholarly study of the Roman imperial cult in Asia Minor by a classicist whose earlier work is itself a standard reference, treated at the top tier as academic press scholarship.
Notes
Scholarly study of the Roman imperial cult in Asia Minor, 1984.
Citation
Author
Simon R. F. Price
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
1984 first edition.
Publication Year
1984
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Asia, Continents

This source names Asia directly: "as practiced in the Greek cities of Asia Minor, published by Cambridge University Press and widely regarded as the field defining treatment of the topic."

Rome, Cities

This source names Rome directly: "imperial cult's different character in Rome itself or in other provinces needs a source addressing that different region."

Claims Backed By This Source (21 claims)

This source backs 21 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Practices, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.