Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Science and Chinese Philosophy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Lisa Raphals wrote this Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry, Science and Chinese Philosophy, first published in 2015 with a substantive revision in 2020, covering figures including Zou Yan and the Yin-Yang school, for which no standalone Stanford Encyclopedia entry exists. Its strength is that it is a peer reviewed, professionally maintained reference by a specialist in early Chinese thought, verified live against the current published entry. Its limit is that as a synthesizing encyclopedia article it necessarily treats Zou Yan and Yin-Yang cosmology at a survey level within a wider entry, so a claim needing focused treatment of Zou Yan specifically needs a dedicated specialist source.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Written by Lisa Raphals, a specialist in early Chinese thought, for the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, a signed, peer reviewed and continually revised specialist reference maintained by the Metaphysics Research Lab at Stanford University; a synthesizing survey entry rather than a full monograph, hence the middle tier.
Notes
First published 2015-04-28; substantive revision 2020-10-07. Covers Zou Yan and the Yin-Yang school; no standalone SEP entry for the school exists. Verified live 2026-08-06.
Citation
Author
Lisa Raphals
Publisher
Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
Publication Year
2015
URL
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-phil-science/
Source Type
reference
Claims Backed By This Source (25 claims)

This source backs 25 claims across the atlas. As facts: 20 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Philosophical Schools, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.