Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Seeing Through Zen: Encounter, Transformation, and Genealogy in Chinese Chan Buddhism

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

John McRae was a specialist historian of Chinese Chan Buddhism, and this study works from close reading of Chan textual sources to treat lineage claims themselves as a genre with their own conventions and purposes, reading a Chan lineage genealogy as a documented rhetorical and religious construction rather than as literal transmission history, a critical method that is the book's real evidentiary contribution rather than a claim about its publisher's standing. That direct textual and genre based analysis is the study's real basis. Use it for established critical scholarly facts about how Chan lineage narratives were constructed and function within the tradition; a claim treating a specific lineage genealogy as literal historical transmission should be checked against this critique first, since that is the assumption this study specifically examines.

Facts
Citation
Author
John R. McRae
Publisher
University of California Press
Publication Year
2003
URL
https://archive.org/details/seeingthroughzen0000mcra
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
John McRae's study treating Chan lineage claims as a documented rhetorical and religious genre with their own conventions, reading a lineage genealogy as a construction rather than as literal transmission history, a critical method that is the book's real contribution.
Notes
No year given pending verification of the edition.
Claims Backed By This Source (184 claims)

This source backs 184 claims across the atlas. As facts: 122 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate, 1 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 16 holds, 8 connected. Plus 33 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 67 claims: 48 well-attested, 8 connected, 11 general references.
  • Sacred Sites, 23 claims: 15 well-attested, 6 holds, 2 general references.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 18 claims: 15 well-attested, 3 general references.
  • Doctrines, 16 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 3 holds, 4 general references.
  • Deities, 13 claims: 10 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Practices, 11 claims: 8 well-attested, 3 general references.
  • Scriptures & Texts, 10 claims: 6 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Historical Figures, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 3 general references.
  • Denominations, 5 claims: 3 holds, 2 general references.
  • Figures, 3 claims: 1 popular myth - corrected, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Disciplines, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Religious Roles & Titles, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Well-attested

122

Disciplines

Practices

Scriptures & Texts

Popular myth - corrected

1
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.