Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Submission to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights on Bill C-229

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Coalition of Hindus of North America's 2022 submission to a House of Commons of Canada committee on Bill C-229 argues for the term "Nazi Hakenkreuz" rather than "swastika" in proposed Canadian hate symbol legislation. Its strength is that it is a real, publicly filed primary document of an actual legislative debate, useful as evidence of the position taken and the argument made. Its limit is that it is advocacy by an interested party in an active political dispute, not a neutral or scholarly account of the swastika's history; this atlas cites it as evidence of the position taken, not as settling the terminology question.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
The Coalition of Hindus of North America's 2022 submission to a Canadian House of Commons committee, the middle tier reflecting that it is a real, publicly filed primary document of an actual legislative debate, weighed against its character as advocacy by an interested party in an active political dispute rather than a neutral or scholarly account.
Notes
Advocacy submission, cited as evidence of the position taken rather than as a neutral account. Argues for the term Nazi Hakenkreuz in place of swastika in Canadian hate-symbol legislation.
Citation
Author
Coalition of Hindus of North America
Publisher
House of Commons of Canada
Publication Year
2022
Source Type
Primary document
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Americas, Continents

This source names Americas directly: "The Coalition of Hindus of North America's 2022 submission to a House of Commons of Canada committee on Bill C-229 argues for the term "Nazi Hakenkreuz" rather than "swastika" in proposed Canadian..."

Canada, Countries

This source names Canada directly: "submission to a House of Commons of Canada committee on Bill C-229 argues for the term "Nazi Hakenkreuz" rather than "swastika" in proposed Canadian hate symbol legislation."

Claims Backed By This Source (12 claims)

This source backs 12 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Religious Symbols, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.