Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in Matthew and Luke

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Raymond E. Brown was a Catholic biblical scholar, and this Doubleday book is his standard scholarly historical-critical commentary on the infancy narratives of Matthew and Luke, examining their composition, sources and theological purposes verse by verse. Its strength is that it remains, decades after publication, the commentary most cited in critical scholarship on these two Gospel birth accounts, combining rigorous historical-critical method with genuine attentiveness to the texts' theological intent. Its limit is that it is a critical academic commentary rather than a devotional or catechetical reading, so a claim about how these narratives are received doctrinally within a specific church tradition needs a source addressing that tradition's own theological reading rather than this historical-critical commentary alone.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Raymond Brown's standard scholarly historical critical commentary on the infancy narratives of Matthew and Luke, by a leading biblical scholar though published by a general trade press.
Notes
Raymond Brown's standard scholarly historical-critical commentary on the infancy narratives of Matthew and Luke, examining their composition, sources and theological purpose. Use for established scholarly facts about the biblical infancy narratives; a critical academic commentary, not a devotional or catechetical reading of the texts.
Citation
Author
Raymond E. Brown
Publisher
Doubleday
Publication Year
1993
URL
https://archive.org/details/birthofmessiahco0000brow_e9u2
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Matthew, Figures

This source names Matthew directly: "on the infancy narratives of Matthew and Luke, examining their composition, sources and theological purposes verse by verse."

Claims Backed By This Source (40 claims)

This source backs 40 claims across the atlas. As facts: 18 well-attested, 8 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 13 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Religious Events, 20 claims: 2 well-attested, 8 scholarly debate, 10 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Cities, 2 claims: 2 general references.
  • Numbers, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.