Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Chinese Rites Controversy from Its Beginning to Modern Times

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Chinese Rites Controversy from Its Beginning to Modern Times, George Minamiki's 1985 scholarly history from Loyola University Press, is the standard academic history of the Jesuit Dominican dispute over Chinese ancestor and Confucian rites, from its origins through the 1704 and 1715 papal condemnations to the 1939 reversal under Pius XII. Its strength is that it is squarely the Ancestor Veneration fact's own subject, spanning the whole controversy to its resolution. Its limit is that a single volume synthesis of a centuries long dispute compresses individual episodes; a claim about one specific missionary's position should be checked against the primary correspondence the book itself draws on.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
George Minamiki's The Chinese Rites Controversy from Its Beginning to Modern Times, Loyola University Press, 1985, the top tier reflecting the standard academic history of the whole dispute, from its origins through the 1704 and 1715 papal condemnations to the 1939 reversal. Its limit is that a single volume synthesis of a centuries long dispute compresses individual episodes, so a claim about one specific missionary's position should be checked against the primary correspondence the book itself draws on.
Notes
Standard academic history of the Jesuit-Dominican dispute over Chinese ancestor and Confucian rites, from its origins through the 1704 and 1715 papal condemnations to the 1939 reversal under Pius XII. Squarely the Ancestor Veneration fact's own subject.
Citation
Author
George Minamiki
Publisher
Loyola University Press
Publication Year
1985
URL
https://www.worldcat.org/title/chinese-rites-controversy-from-its-beginning-to-modern-times/oclc/11090148
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Pius XII, Figures

This source names Pius XII directly: "to the 1939 reversal under Pius XII."

Claims Backed By This Source (12 claims)

This source backs 12 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Practices, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.