Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Discoverie of Witchcraft

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Discoverie of Witchcraft is Reginald Scot's own sixteenth century primary text arguing that people accused of witchcraft were typically deluded, ill or defrauded rather than genuinely guilty of the crimes charged, and it includes an English translation of Weyer's demon catalogue within it. The year recorded, 1584, is the first edition; a later enlarged edition of 1665 has been demonstrated, through specific spellings and errors unique to that printing, to be the direct textual ancestor of the Goetia material this atlas also holds, a traceable textual lineage rather than an assumed one. Use it to establish what Scot's own argument said and to trace the specific 1665 printing's role in later grimoire history.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Reginald Scot's sixteenth-century primary text arguing that accused witches were typically deluded, ill or defrauded; the later 1665 enlarged edition has been demonstrated, by spellings and errors unique to that printing, to be the direct textual ancestor of the Goetia.
Notes
Sceptical work arguing that accused witches were deluded, ill or defrauded. Contains an English translation of Weyer's catalogue. Year given is that of the first edition; the enlarged edition of 1665 is the one demonstrated to be the direct ancestor of the Goetia's text, by errors and spellings unique to that printing.
Citation
Author
Reginald Scot
Publisher
Elliot Stock
This is an 1886 reprint; Scot's Discoverie of Witchcraft was first published in 1584.
Publication Year
1584
URL
https://archive.org/details/discoverieofwitc00scot
Source Type
primary-text
Claims Backed By This Source (245 claims)

This source backs 245 claims across the atlas. As facts: 168 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. Plus 75 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Goetic Demons, 216 claims: 144 well-attested, 72 general references.
  • Esoteric Texts, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Historical Figures, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
  • Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

2

Historical Figures

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.