W. H. C. Frend was a historian of the early church, and this Clarendon Press book is his long-standard monograph on the Donatist schism, the fourth and fifth century North African Christian movement that rejected clergy it viewed as having compromised under Roman persecution. Its strength is that it remains the fullest single treatment in English of the movement's history and sources, decades after publication. Its limit is one this atlas notes wherever the book is cited, Frend's particular social reading of Donatism, as substantially a movement of native African protest against Roman authority, is itself now argued with by later historians who read the evidence differently, so a claim resting on that specific interpretive framework should be flagged as one reading among others rather than settled fact.
Facts
Citation
AuthorW. H. C. Frend
PublisherClarendon Press
Publication Year1952
URLhttps://archive.org/details/donatistchurchmo0000fren
Source Typeacademic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Published by Clarendon Press as W. H. C. Frend's academic history of the Donatist Church, peer reviewed university press scholarship. NotesThe long-standard monograph on the Donatist schism. Its social reading of the movement is itself now argued with, which is noted where it is cited.
Claims Backed By This Source (37 claims)
This source backs 37 claims across the atlas. As facts: 26 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 4 holds, 1 connected. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Historical Figures, 12 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 open question, 4 holds, 2 general references.
- Open Questions, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Wars & Conflicts, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.