Robin Coningham, Kosh Prasad Acharya and their co-authors are archaeologists, and this peer reviewed article in the journal Antiquity reports their excavation identifying the earliest structural shrine beneath the Maya Devi Temple at Lumbini, the Buddha's traditional birthplace in Nepal. Its strength is that it is peer reviewed field archaeology with stratigraphic and radiocarbon evidence, published in a leading archaeology journal, establishing the earliest known Buddhist shrine at the site. Its limit is that it dates a structure at the traditional birthplace, it does not itself settle the separate historical question of the Buddha's own birth date or the reliability of the site's identification, so a claim resting on those wider questions needs additional sources.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Published in Antiquity, a leading peer reviewed archaeology journal, Robin Coningham, Kosh Prasad Acharya and co-authors' peer reviewed field archaeology report with stratigraphic and radiocarbon evidence, peer reviewed university-level scholarship. NotesArchaeological excavation report identifying the earliest structural shrine at the Buddha's traditional birthplace, Lumbini, Nepal.
Citation
AuthorRobin Coningham; Kosh Prasad Acharya; and others
PublisherAntiquity
Publication Year2013
Source Typepeer-reviewed article
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Nepal directly: "the Buddha's traditional birthplace in Nepal."
Claims Backed By This Source (26 claims)
This source backs 26 claims across the atlas. As facts: 20 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sacred Sites, 13 claims: 10 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Figures, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
- Cities, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.