Isidore Okpewho's The Epic in Africa is a foundational scholarly study by a Nigerian literary scholar arguing, against an earlier assumption that epic was a peculiarly European or Homeric form, that African oral traditions produce genuine epic poetry with their own aesthetics of performance. Its authority rests on close comparative analysis across multiple African oral epic traditions combined with Okpewho's own standing as a leading Africanist literary scholar working partly from within the cultures he studies. As an argument-driven work of literary theory rather than a neutral catalog, its classifications and comparative claims represent one influential scholarly position within African oral literature studies, since which traditions count as epic and by what criteria remains a live scholarly conversation Okpewho's book helped shape rather than closed.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Isidore Okpewho's The Epic in Africa, published by Columbia University Press, is a foundational scholarly study by a Nigerian literary scholar, treated at the top tier as academic press scholarship that reshaped the field's treatment of African oral epic. NotesIsidore Okpewho's scholarly study of African oral epic performance and poetics, covering named epics including the Ozidi Saga, the Mwindo Epic and the Epic of Sundiata. Use for established scholarly facts about these epics as oral performance traditions; a comparative literary study, not a source for any one epic's full narrative content.
Citation
AuthorIsidore Okpewho
PublisherColumbia University Press
Publication Year1979
Source Typeacademic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Africa directly: "Isidore Okpewho's The Epic in Africa is a foundational scholarly study by a Nigerian literary scholar arguing, against an earlier assumption that epic was a peculiarly European or Homeric form, that..."
Claims Backed By This Source (17 claims)
This source backs 17 claims across the atlas. As facts: 7 well-attested. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Other Writings, 6 claims: 3 holds, 3 general references.
- Languages, 3 claims: 3 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.