Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Five "Confucian" Classics

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Michael Nylan traces how the Chinese Five Classics were actually transmitted, edited and read differently across different periods of Chinese history, rather than treating their meaning as fixed since antiquity, which is the book's real historical argument. This record has not independently traced a documented history of scholarly disagreement with her specific account of that transmission. It is the right source for the textual history and canonical status of these classics over time. It is a study of how the classics were transmitted and read, not itself a translation of their content, so a claim about what a classic actually says needs a direct translation as its source.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A scholarly study from a university press tracing how the Chinese Five Classics were actually transmitted, edited and read differently across periods of Chinese history rather than treating their meaning as fixed since antiquity.
Notes
Scholarly study of the historical formation, transmission and changing interpretation of the Chinese Five Classics (Changes, Documents, Odes, Rites, Spring and Autumn Annals) within the Confucian tradition. Use for facts about the textual history and canonical status of these classics, not as a translation of their content.
Citation
Author
Michael Nylan
Publisher
Yale University Press
Publication Year
2001
URL
https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300212006/the-five-confucian-classics/
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (487 claims)

This source backs 487 claims across the atlas. As facts: 386 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 9 holds. Plus 91 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • I Ching Hexagrams, 320 claims: 256 well-attested, 64 general references.
  • Bagua Trigrams, 56 claims: 48 well-attested, 8 general references.
  • Wu Xing (Five Phases), 34 claims: 24 well-attested, 5 holds, 5 general references.
  • Articles, 27 claims: 27 well-attested.
  • Prayers, 9 claims: 6 well-attested, 3 general references.
  • Scriptures & Texts, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Figures, 7 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 3 holds, 1 general references.
  • Subcategories, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Disciplines, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Scripture Portions, 3 claims: 3 general references.
  • Historical Periods, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Sacred Geometry, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

Holds

9

Sacred Objects & Ritual Items

Wu Xing (Five Phases)

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.