Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Formula of Concord

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Formula of Concord is a primary Lutheran confessional text, gathered by name from multiple named authors, Jakob Andreae, Martin Chemnitz and Nikolaus Selnecker among them, to settle disputes that had arisen within Lutheranism after Luther's own death, and later collected into the 1580 Book of Concord. As a primary text it is authoritative for what this specific settlement states, including its articles on the Lord's Supper and the person of Christ arguing the Lutheran position against both the Reformed and the memorialist views, checkable directly against the text, not for how a specific modern Lutheran body currently applies a given article. Use it to establish the Lutheran confessional position of 1577 on a named point of doctrine.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The settlement of the intra-Lutheran doctrinal disputes, gathered into the 1580 Book of Concord; its articles on the Lord's Supper and on the person of Christ state the Lutheran position against both the Reformed and the memorialist views.
Notes
The settlement of the intra-Lutheran disputes, gathered into the Book of Concord of 1580. Its articles on the Lord's Supper and on the person of Christ state the Lutheran position against both the Reformed and the memorialists.
Citation
Author
Jakob Andreae, Martin Chemnitz, Nikolaus Selnecker and others
Publication Year
1577
URL
https://files.lcms.org/dl/f/formula-of-concord-reading-booklet
Source Type
primary-text
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Lutheranism directly: "settle disputes that had arisen within Lutheranism after Luther's own death, and later collected into the 1580 Book of Concord."

Source The Formula of ConcordJakob Andreae, Martin Chemnitz, Nikolaus Selnecker and others
Claims Backed By This Source (63 claims)

This source backs 63 claims across the atlas. As facts: 24 well-attested. As cited relationships: 18 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 2 held Differently. Plus 18 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Doctrines, 30 claims: 7 well-attested, 12 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 2 held Differently, 8 general references.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 10 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 holds, 4 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Denominations, 6 claims: 3 well-attested, 3 general references.
  • Rituals, 4 claims: 2 holds, 2 general references.
  • Creeds & Confessions, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.

Critiqued Here

1

Held Differently

2
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.