Betty Jo Teeter Dobbs's The Foundations of Newton's Alchemy, or The Hunting of the Greene Lyon, published by Cambridge University Press in 1975, is a scholarly study of Isaac Newton's extensive alchemical research, a body of work long marginalized in Newton scholarship before Dobbs's own detailed archival study of his alchemical manuscripts. Its authority rests on standard academic peer review at a major university press and Dobbs's own direct archival work with Newton's actual alchemical papers. Its strength is treating that material as a serious subject of intellectual history rather than dismissing it as an embarrassing footnote to Newton's physics, a stance later Newton scholarship has largely followed. Its limit is age relative to the considerable further Newton alchemy scholarship the following decades produced, so a very specific claim benefits from checking against that later literature as well.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Betty Jo Teeter Dobbs's The Foundations of Newton's Alchemy, published by Cambridge University Press in 1975, the top tier reflecting standard academic peer review at a major university press and Dobbs's own direct archival work with Newton's actual alchemical manuscripts, notwithstanding that its age relative to considerable further Newton alchemy scholarship since means a very specific claim benefits from checking that later literature too. NotesScholarly study of Isaac Newton's alchemical research and its foundations.
Citation
AuthorBetty Jo Teeter Dobbs
PublisherCambridge University Press
Publication Year1975
Source TypeBook (secondary)
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Lyon, Cities This source names Lyon directly: "Alchemy, or The Hunting of the Greene Lyon, published by Cambridge University Press in 1975, is a scholarly study of Isaac Newton's extensive alchemical research, a body of work long marginalized in..."
Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)
This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Historical Figures, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Disciplines, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.