Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Future of an Illusion (Die Zukunft einer Illusion)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Future of an Illusion, Sigmund Freud's own 1927 work published in German by the Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag, argues that religious belief functions as a collective illusion serving a psychological need, a wish for protection against a hostile and indifferent natural world modeled on the child's relationship to a protective father. Its strength is that it is Freud's own clearest, most direct statement of his view of religion as illusion rather than delusion, meaning a belief shaped by wish rather than necessarily false, a distinction that shaped a whole later secular tradition of explaining religion psychologically. Its limit is that it is argument rather than empirical study, resting on Freud's own clinical theory of infantile psychology extended by analogy to whole civilizations, a move many historians of religion and even later psychoanalysts have found unsupported by evidence, so a claim about why people actually hold religious belief, rather than what Freud theorized about it, needs sources beyond Freud's own argument.

Facts
Citation
Author
Sigmund Freud
Publisher
Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag
Leipzig, Vienna and Zurich, 1927 first edition of Die Zukunft einer Illusion, the German title this entry itself names. The English translation (Hogarth Press, London) followed in 1928.
Publication Year
1927
Source Type
primary-text
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
The Future of an Illusion is Freud's own 1927 primary argument that religion functions as collective wish-fulfillment, essential as his clearest statement of that view, but it rests on clinical theory extended by analogy rather than empirical study, which the middle tier reflects.
Notes
Freud's foundational psychoanalytic treatise arguing that religious belief is an illusion rooted in psychological need.
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)

This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Other Writings, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
  • Historical Figures, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Cities, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.