Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The God of the Maccabees: Studies on the Meaning and Origin of the Maccabean Revolt

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Elias J. Bickerman's The God of the Maccabees, Studies on the Meaning and Origin of the Maccabean Revolt, published by E. J. Brill in 1979, is a scholarly study by a leading historian of the Hellenistic world arguing that the Maccabean revolt was triggered less by simple pagan persecution than by a specific, radical religious reform imposed with the cooperation of Hellenizing Jews themselves, reframing the conflict as partly an internal Jewish struggle over how far to accommodate Greek culture. Its strength is Bickerman's command of the Hellenistic political and religious context surrounding Judea, treating the revolt within the wider pattern of Seleucid religious policy rather than in isolation. Its limit is that Bickerman's specific reconstruction of how the reform was proposed and by whom remains debated among specialists in Second Temple Judaism, some of whom read the evidence differently, so a claim resting on his precise account of the reform's origin should be checked against the wider scholarly discussion it helped provoke.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Elias Bickerman's The God of the Maccabees, published by E. J. Brill in 1979, is a scholarly study by a leading historian of the Hellenistic world, treated at the top tier as peer reviewed academic press scholarship, notwithstanding that his specific reconstruction remains debated among specialists.
Notes
English translation of Der Gott der Makkabaer, first published in German in 1937. The classic statement of the reading that the persecution originated with hellenizing Jerusalem Jews rather than with the Seleucid king.
Citation
Author
Elias J. Bickerman
Publisher
E. J. Brill
Publication Year
1979
Source Type
book
Claims Backed By This Source (18 claims)

This source backs 18 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Empires & Polities, 7 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 4 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
  • Historical Periods, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

Empires & Polities

Holds

4

Empires & Polities

General References

2

Empires & Polities

Historical Periods

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.