This is the National Museum of Denmark's own custodial record for the Gundestrup Cauldron, the museum that holds, conserves and catalogues the artifact and administers its public interpretation. As the holding institution's own standing record it is authoritative for provenance and custody facts, where and when the cauldron was found and how the museum dates and describes it. Its limit is that it is an institutional record rather than a scholarly publication, so a claim about the cauldron's contested origin, whether Thracian, Gaulish or Celtic workmanship, or about the meaning of its imagery, needs a separate scholarly source engaging that debate directly rather than the museum's own catalogue account.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Custodial/institutional self-account (a museum's own record of its holdings). Museums and other institutional self-accounts sit at tier 2, not tier 1 or tier 3; tier 3 is reserved for a tradition's own account of its own teachings and practice. NotesThe National Museum of Denmark's own custodial record for the Gundestrup Cauldron; a standing institutional record, not a scholarly publication, good for provenance and holding-institution facts, not for the object's own history or meaning.
Citation
AuthorNational Museum of Denmark
PublisherNational Museum of Denmark
URLhttps://en.natmus.dk/historical-knowledge/denmark/prehistoric-period-until-1050-ad/the-early-iron-age/the-gundestrup-cauldron/
Source TypeMuseum
Custodian
Custodian SourceYes
Custodian BodyNational Museum of Denmark (Nationalmuseet)
Custodian BasisHolding institution of the artifact documented: legal custodian responsible for its conservation, catalogue record, and public interpretation.
Claims Backed By This Source (23 claims)
This source backs 23 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 10 claims: 10 well-attested.
- Artifacts & Relics, 8 claims: 4 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
- Custodians & Museums, 3 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.