Christopher S. Mackay is a classicist and historian, and this Cambridge University Press volume is his current scholarly translation of the Malleus Maleficarum, the fifteenth century witch-hunting manual, with a scholarly introduction covering its printing history, the papal bull attached to early editions and the University of Cologne's actual limited approbation of the work. Its strength is that Mackay's introduction corrects popular misconceptions about the text's authority, including the frequently repeated but inaccurate claim that it carried full and unanimous Church endorsement. Its limit is that it is a translation and historical introduction, not a broader history of the witch trials themselves, so a claim about the trials' actual scope and toll across Europe needs a source addressing that wider history rather than this text alone.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
The current standard scholarly translation of the Malleus Maleficarum, with an introduction covering its printing history and papal approval. NotesThe current scholarly translation, with an introduction covering the printing history, the papal bull and the Cologne approbation.
Citation
AuthorChristopher S. Mackay
PublisherCambridge University Press
Publication Year2009
Source TypeCritical translation with scholarly introduction
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Europe directly: "trials' actual scope and toll across Europe needs a source addressing that wider history rather than this text alone."
Claims Backed By This Source (42 claims)
This source backs 42 claims across the atlas. As facts: 33 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Esoteric Texts, 14 claims: 12 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Historical Figures, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Religious Legal Instruments, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
Well-attested
33Religious Legal Instruments
Holds
3Religious Legal Instruments
General References
3Religious Legal Instruments
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.