Margaret Mark and Carol Pearson are marketing and psychology consultants, and this book, published by McGraw-Hill, applies Carl Jung's concept of archetypes to brand identity and marketing strategy, a modern applied framework the authors themselves developed for business use rather than a work of religious studies or textual scholarship. Its relevance to the atlas is specifically as a primary example of Jungian archetype theory being adapted into a practitioner's own applied system, comparable to how other practitioner frameworks are treated, and it should be read as documenting that adaptation and its claims rather than as independent evidence that archetypes function as described. Its limit is that it was written for a business audience seeking practical branding guidance, not for testing the psychological or mythological claims underlying the framework.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
A marketing and branding book applying Pearson's archetype system to commercial brand strategy; useful only to document this specific commercial application, not as a source on religion, mythology or psychology, and not evidence of archetypes' cross-cultural validity. NotesA marketing and branding book applying Pearson's archetype system to commercial brand strategy. Use only to document this specific commercial application of archetype theory to branding; it is not a source on religion, mythology or psychology beyond that application, and should not be cited for any claim about archetypes' cross-cultural validity.
Citation
AuthorMargaret Mark and Carol S. Pearson
PublisherMcGraw-Hill
Publication Year2001
URLhttps://archive.org/details/herooutlawbuildi0000mark
Source TypeModern applied work
Claims Backed By This Source (37 claims)
This source backs 37 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. As cited relationships: 12 holds. Plus 12 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Archetypes, 26 claims: 2 well-attested, 12 holds, 12 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.