This is not a separate work: it is the Society for Psychical Research's own Psi Encyclopedia entry on the 1885 Hodgson Report and Theosophy, one article inside the same continuously maintained online reference this atlas also records as a general source. It descends from that encyclopedia rather than standing beside it, so citing this entry alongside the general Psi Encyclopedia record, or alongside another of its articles, is one editorial voice, not corroboration. Its real limit is the encyclopedia's own limit: an advocacy-adjacent field reference rather than a religiously neutral academic body. Use it for what this specific entry states about the Hodgson Report and its reception; a claim needing independent scholarly assessment of the report needs a source produced outside the Society.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
This Psi Encyclopedia entry on the 1885 Hodgson Report and Theosophy, the top tier reflecting that it is the Society for Psychical Research's own article within its continuously maintained online reference, a direct institutional voice authoritative for what this specific entry states about the report and its reception, notwithstanding that it is one editorial voice within an advocacy-adjacent field reference rather than a religiously neutral academic body, so citing it alongside another Psi Encyclopedia article is not independent corroboration. NotesThe Society for Psychical Research's own Psi Encyclopedia entry on the 1885 Hodgson Report and Theosophy; a reference article, not independent scholarly analysis.
Citation
AuthorPsi Encyclopedia
PublisherSociety for Psychical Research
URLhttps://psi-encyclopedia.spr.ac.uk/articles/hodgson-report-theosophy
Source Typereference
Cross-Tradition Connections
Derived From
This record's own Notes state plainly that it is the Society for Psychical Research's own Psi Encyclopedia entry on The Hodgson Report (Theosophy); one article inside that same continuously maintained online reference, not a witness independent of it.
Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)
This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 connected, 2 critiqued Here. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 connected.
- Historical Figures, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 critiqued Here, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.