Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Icon

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is Konrad Onasch and Annemarie Schnieper's own scholarly survey of the Eastern Christian icon, published in English translation by Riverside Book Company in 1997 from the authors' original German edition, Onasch a scholar of Christian archaeology and ecclesiastical art and Schnieper an art historian and journalist. It covers the historical origins of icon painting, the major icon centers and schools, recurring themes by image subject, and the materials and technique of icon production. Its strength is that it is a substantial, richly illustrated academic survey by specialists in the field. Its limit is that as a broad survey it moves quickly across many centuries and regions, so a claim needing depth on one specific icon tradition or period should be checked against a more narrowly focused scholarly source as well.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Trade art-book publisher (Riverside Book Company), named scholarly authors (Konrad Onasch, a professor of Eastern-church history, and Annemarie Schnieper), not peer-reviewed and not the Orthodox church's own account. Same shape already read as tier 2 twice in this corpus: source 44561 (Houghton Mifflin trade-press biography) and 44586 (Harper and Brothers trade-press philosophical work), neither academic/peer-reviewed nor any tradition's own voice.
Notes
Scholarly study of the Eastern Christian icon.
Citation
Author
Konrad Onasch and Annemarie Schnieper
Publisher
Riverside Book Company
Publication Year
1997
Source Type
Scholarly study
Claims Backed By This Source (25 claims)

This source backs 25 claims across the atlas. As facts: 19 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Other Writings, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Holidays & Festivals, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Languages, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.