Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Image of God in the Book of Genesis, A Study of Terminology

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

James Barr's The Image of God in the Book of Genesis is a scholarly philological study examining what the Hebrew phrase for humanity being made in God's image actually meant in its ancient Near Eastern context, written by one of the most respected biblical Hebrew scholars of his generation. Its authority rests on close linguistic and comparative textual analysis rather than theological argument for its own sake, and Barr's conclusions have been influential in shifting scholarly discussion of the phrase's original sense away from later doctrinal readings developed centuries after Genesis was written. As a technical philological study its scope is specifically the phrase's ancient meaning, not a survey of how the image of God concept was subsequently developed across the long history of Jewish and Christian theology, which is a separate and much larger body of literature.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
James Barr's The Image of God in the Book of Genesis, published in the Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, is a scholarly philological study by one of the most respected biblical Hebrew scholars of his generation, treated at the top tier.
Notes
Philological study of tselem and demut across the Hebrew Bible, foundational to the modern scholarly debate over what the divine image terminology marks.
Citation
Author
James Barr
Publisher
Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, volume 51, pages 11 to 26
Publication Year
1968
Source Type
Journal article
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)

This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 connected. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 9 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 connected, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Doctrines, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.