Sources
The Maya
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Michael Coe and Stephen Houston are archaeologists specializing in Maya civilization, and this is a long running academic reference work, first published in the 1960s and substantially revised across many later editions as Maya hieroglyphic decipherment advanced, since large parts of Maya writing were only readable well after the book's first edition. Its strength is that it has kept pace with a field that changed dramatically, especially after the breakthroughs in reading Maya script, so later editions correct and add to earlier ones rather than standing unchanged. Its method draws on archaeology, decipherment and ethnohistory together. Its limit for a reader is that findings can still shift with new decipherment, so a claim sourced here should be understood as the settled view current to its edition rather than as unchangeable.
Facts
Citation
AuthorMichael D. Coe and Stephen Houston
PublisherThames and Hudson
Publication Year1966
This is Coe's solo first edition; co-author Stephen Houston joined in a later edition. URLhttps://archive.org/details/maya0000coem
Source Typereference
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Published by Thames and Hudson and the standard university-course reference on Maya civilization; a reputable secondary synthesis by working archaeologists rather than a primary excavation report, hence the middle tier. NotesStandard single-volume survey, revised across many editions. Cited for the general course of Maya history and the state of the decipherment. Edition and year not verified and therefore left null rather than guessed.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Maya, Figures This source names Maya directly: "are archaeologists specializing in Maya civilization, and this is a long running academic reference work, first published in the 1960s and substantially revised across many later editions as Maya..."
Source The MayaMichael D. Coe and Stephen Houston Claims Backed By This Source (36 claims)
This source backs 36 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. As cited relationships: 7 holds. Plus 16 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Deities, 15 claims: 1 well-attested, 3 holds, 11 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Sacred Sites, 4 claims: 2 holds, 2 general references.
- Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
- Languages, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Prayers, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Religions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.