Vladimir Lossky's The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church, published by James Clarke in 1957, is a scholarly exposition of Eastern Orthodox theology written by a Russian emigre theologian, arguing that Orthodox mysticism and Orthodox dogmatic theology are not separate tracks but one integrated whole, centered on the distinction between God's unknowable essence and his knowable energies. Lossky wrote as a committed Orthodox theologian himself rather than an outside academic observer, giving the book real authority as a statement of how the tradition understands itself. Its strength is that insider theological precision, presenting apophatic, negative way, theology and the essence-energies distinction with the kind of internal coherence only a practicing theologian of the tradition could give it. Its limit is exactly that insider position, the book presents Orthodox theology as Lossky and his particular twentieth century Paris school understood it, a specific and influential but not uncontested reading within Orthodoxy itself, so a claim needing the tradition's full internal diversity needs sources beyond Lossky's own synthesis.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Vladimir Lossky's The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church, published by James Clarke in 1957, is a widely cited theological exposition by an Orthodox scholar, the middle tier reflecting a confessional theological work rather than a religiously neutral academic history. NotesLossky's scholarly systematic study of Eastern Orthodox mystical theology.
Citation
AuthorVladimir Lossky
PublisherJames Clarke
Publication Year1957
Source TypeScholarly work
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Paris, Cities This source names Paris directly: "and his particular twentieth century Paris school understood it, a specific and influential but not uncontested reading within Orthodoxy itself, so a claim needing the tradition's full internal..."
Claims Backed By This Source (17 claims)
This source backs 17 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Doctrines, 8 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 holds, 3 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.