Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Newark Holy Stones: The Social Context of an Enduring Scientific Forgery

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Bradley Lepper and Jeff Gill's article in Timeline, the magazine of the Ohio Historical Society, published in 2000, is the standard account of the Newark Holy Stones, examined by Lepper, the Society's curator of archaeology, and placing the inscribed stones as a mid-nineteenth century forgery tied to local disputes over the mound-building past. Its strength is that it is written by the specialist directly responsible for the artifacts' institutional custody and study, working from the documentary record of their 1860 discovery. Its limit is that it is a single institutional analysis rather than an independent peer-reviewed monograph, so a claim resting on a disputed point of the stones' fabrication history should be checked against the wider literature on nineteenth century American antiquarian forgeries as well.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Bradley Lepper and Jeff Gill's article in Timeline, the magazine of the Ohio Historical Society, published in 2000, is the standard scholarly account establishing the stones as a nineteenth century forgery, treated at the top tier.
Notes
Analysis by the Ohio Historical Society's curator of archaeology placing the stones as a mid-19th-century forgery.
Citation
Author
Bradley T. Lepper and Jeff Gill
Publisher
Timeline (Ohio Historical Society)
Publication Year
2000
URL
https://www.ohioarchaeology.org
Source Type
academic article
Claims Backed By This Source (22 claims)

This source backs 22 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested, 2 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Artifacts & Relics, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
  • Custodians & Museums, 3 claims: 1 popular myth - corrected, 1 holds, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.