Home›Sources›The Oxford Companion to the BookSourcesThe Oxford Companion to the BookCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "The Oxford Companion to the Book." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/sources/the-oxford-companion-to-the-book.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). The Oxford Companion to the Book. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/sources/the-oxford-companion-to-the-bookCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-the-oxford-companion-to-the-book, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {The Oxford Companion to the Book}, year = {2026}, url = {https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/sources/the-oxford-companion-to-the-book}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXThis is a standard scholarly reference on the history of the book, with entries from named specialists in manuscript and print culture covering how texts were physically produced and transmitted across periods and traditions worldwide, edited by Michael Suarez and H. R. Woudhuysen. That named specialist contributor structure, the same model that gives an edited scholarly reference its real authority, is why this atlas relies on it for questions of textual transmission specifically. Use it for established facts about the manuscript or print history of a specific text, how it was physically transmitted rather than what it says; a claim about a text's religious content or doctrine needs a source addressing that content directly, since this reference is about the book as a physical and historical object.FactsClaims Backed By This Source (97 claims)Comments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)FactsAssessmentReliability TierWell-attested1A standard scholarly reference on the history of the book, manuscript and print culture worldwide, published by Oxford University Press; use for the manuscript or print history of a specific text, not for that text's religious content.NotesWell-attestedStandard scholarly reference on the history of the book, manuscript and print culture worldwide, covering production, transmission and the physical form of texts across periods and traditions. Use for established facts about the manuscript or print history of a specific text or tradition of textual transmission; a book-history reference, not a source on a text's religious content.CitationAuthorWell-attestedMichael F. Suarez and H. R. Woudhuysen (editors)PublisherWell-attestedOxford University PressPublication YearWell-attested2010Source TypeWell-attestedacademic referenceClaims Backed By This Source (97 claims)This source backs 97 claims across the atlas. As facts: 67 well-attested. As cited relationships: 10 holds. Plus 20 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.Disposition By TopicArticles, 50 claims: 30 well-attested, 10 holds, 10 general references.Scholarly Disciplines, 40 claims: 30 well-attested, 10 general references.Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.Well-attested67ArticlesAlphonse Dain Names a Discipline the Book Trade Already PracticedCutter's Rules and the Record That Stands In for the ObjectEvery Owner Leaves a Mark, and the Chain Has to HoldFebvre and Martin Ask What Printing Actually ChangedKnowing Who Actually Owns the Right to Reprint ItMabillon Defends a Forged Charter and Founds a DisciplineMcKerrow's Handbook and the Study of the Printed Object ItselfReading What the Source Actually Says, Not What Someone Said It SaidThe Dutch Manual and the Rule That a Record Means Its Own CollectionThree Kinds of Evidence, Read Off One ObjectScholarly DisciplinesAnalytical BibliographyArchival ResearchCatalogue ResearchCodicologyHistory of the BookManuscript ProvenanceManuscript StudiesPalaeographyPrimary Literature AccessRights and Permissions ReviewSourcesThe Oxford Companion to the BookHolds10ArticlesAlphonse Dain Names a Discipline the Book Trade Already PracticedCutter's Rules and the Record That Stands In for the ObjectEvery Owner Leaves a Mark, and the Chain Has to HoldFebvre and Martin Ask What Printing Actually ChangedKnowing Who Actually Owns the Right to Reprint ItMabillon Defends a Forged Charter and Founds a DisciplineMcKerrow's Handbook and the Study of the Printed Object ItselfReading What the Source Actually Says, Not What Someone Said It SaidThe Dutch Manual and the Rule That a Record Means Its Own CollectionThree Kinds of Evidence, Read Off One ObjectGeneral References20ArticlesAlphonse Dain Names a Discipline the Book Trade Already PracticedCutter's Rules and the Record That Stands In for the ObjectEvery Owner Leaves a Mark, and the Chain Has to HoldFebvre and Martin Ask What Printing Actually ChangedKnowing Who Actually Owns the Right to Reprint ItMabillon Defends a Forged Charter and Founds a DisciplineMcKerrow's Handbook and the Study of the Printed Object ItselfReading What the Source Actually Says, Not What Someone Said It SaidThe Dutch Manual and the Rule That a Record Means Its Own CollectionThree Kinds of Evidence, Read Off One ObjectScholarly DisciplinesAnalytical BibliographyArchival ResearchCatalogue ResearchCodicologyHistory of the BookManuscript ProvenanceManuscript StudiesPalaeographyPrimary Literature AccessRights and Permissions ReviewComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year