Home›Sources›The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European WorldSourcesThe Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European WorldCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/sources/the-oxford-introduction-to-proto-indo-european-and-the-proto-indo-european-world.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/sources/the-oxford-introduction-to-proto-indo-european-and-the-proto-indo-european-worldCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-the-oxford-introduction-to-proto-indo-eu, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World}, year = {2026}, url = {https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/sources/the-oxford-introduction-to-proto-indo-european-and-the-proto-indo-european-world}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXJ. P. Mallory and D. Q. Adams are scholars of Indo-European linguistics and archaeology, and this academic book, published by Oxford University Press, surveys what is known and reconstructed about the Proto-Indo-European language and the culture of its speakers, combining comparative linguistic reconstruction with archaeological evidence about the likely homeland and society of early Indo-European speakers. Its strength is genuine interdisciplinary rigor, treating linguistic reconstruction and archaeological evidence as separate lines of evidence that must independently support any claim about Indo-European origins, rather than assuming one confirms the other automatically. Its limit is that both the linguistic reconstruction and the archaeological homeland question remain areas of real scholarly debate, and the authors are explicit about which specific claims are well supported versus more speculative.FactsClaims Backed By This Source (64 claims)Comments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)FactsAssessmentReliability TierWell-attested1J. P. Mallory and D. Q. Adams's standard scholarly reference on the reconstructed Proto-Indo-European language and the culture, including religion and mythology, inferred for its speakers through comparative linguistics and archaeology; reconstruction from the comparative method carries inherent uncertainty greater than for a directly attested textual tradition.NotesWell-attestedStandard scholarly reference on the reconstructed Proto-Indo-European language and the culture, including religion and mythology, inferred for its speakers through comparative linguistics and archaeology. Use for established facts about reconstructed Proto-Indo-European vocabulary and culture; reconstruction from the comparative method carries inherent uncertainty, greater than for a directly attested textual tradition.CitationAuthorWell-attestedJ. P. Mallory and D. Q. AdamsPublisherWell-attestedOxford University PressPublication YearWell-attested2006Source TypeWell-attestedacademic monographClaims Backed By This Source (64 claims)This source backs 64 claims across the atlas. As facts: 46 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 13 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.Disposition By TopicArticles, 25 claims: 17 well-attested, 4 holds, 4 general references.Scholarly Disciplines, 16 claims: 12 well-attested, 4 general references.Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.Deities, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.Language Families, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 2 general references.Languages, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.Cultures, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.Well-attested46ArticlesA Language Nobody Ever Wrote DownBurnouf Turns From Buddhist Manuscripts to the AvestaJones Addresses the Asiatic Society and Names a Lost Common AncestorMax Muller's Edition Gives the Rigveda a Scholarly TextReconstructing a Religion From WordsRoth Insists the Veda and the Avesta Must Be Read as SiblingsThe Branch With Two Ancient ScripturesThe Family That Created a DisciplineWhen a God on One Side Is a Demon on the OtherCulturesHittitesDeitiesThe Ashwini KumarasLanguage FamiliesIndo-EuropeanIndo-IranianLanguagesProto-Indo-EuropeanScholarly DisciplinesIndo-Iranian Comparative LinguisticsOld Iranian PhilologySanskrit PhilologyVedic PhilologySourcesThe Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European WorldHolds5ArticlesBurnouf Turns From Buddhist Manuscripts to the AvestaJones Addresses the Asiatic Society and Names a Lost Common AncestorMax Muller's Edition Gives the Rigveda a Scholarly TextRoth Insists the Veda and the Avesta Must Be Read as SiblingsDeitiesThe Ashwini KumarasGeneral References13ArticlesBurnouf Turns From Buddhist Manuscripts to the AvestaJones Addresses the Asiatic Society and Names a Lost Common AncestorMax Muller's Edition Gives the Rigveda a Scholarly TextRoth Insists the Veda and the Avesta Must Be Read as SiblingsCulturesHittitesDeitiesThe Ashwini KumarasLanguage FamiliesIndo-EuropeanIndo-IranianLanguagesProto-Indo-EuropeanScholarly DisciplinesIndo-Iranian Comparative LinguisticsOld Iranian PhilologySanskrit PhilologyVedic PhilologyComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year