Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Politics of Ritual and Remembrance: Laos Since 1975

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Grant Evans's The Politics of Ritual and Remembrance, Laos Since 1975, published by the University of Hawaii Press in 1998, is a scholarly study of how Laos's communist government has managed Buddhist ritual, royal symbolism and public memory since the 1975 revolution, built on Evans's own fieldwork and archival research in a country outside researchers had limited access to for decades. Evans was a leading Southeast Asian studies specialist with sustained direct research experience in Laos specifically. Its strength is that rare direct access and fieldwork grounding on a country understudied relative to its neighbors, tracing concretely how the state has selectively preserved and repurposed Buddhist ritual for its own legitimacy. Its limit is that the book covers the period through the late 1990s, so a claim about Laos's more recent religious policy or ritual practice in the decades since needs more current sources, since Lao state religious policy has continued to develop past this study's own coverage.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Grant Evans's The Politics of Ritual and Remembrance, Laos Since 1975, published by the University of Hawaii Press, is a scholarly study by a leading specialist in Lao and Southeast Asian studies, treated at the top tier as academic press scholarship.
Notes
Academic study of ritual and political memory in Laos since the 1975 communist revolution.
Citation
Author
Grant Evans
Publisher
University of Hawaii Press
Publication Year
1998
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Laos, Countries

This source names Laos directly: "Politics of Ritual and Remembrance, Laos Since 1975, published by the University of Hawaii Press in 1998, is a scholarly study of how Laos's communist government has managed Buddhist ritual, royal..."

Claims Backed By This Source (33 claims)

This source backs 33 claims across the atlas. As facts: 25 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Rituals, 11 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Sacred Sites, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Religions, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Figures, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.